if students designed their own learning

Video

This is a must see video about giving students control over their own learning. I see this video as the end point but where could it start? Imagine asking Lower School students to create a plan to learn more about our environment, asking Middle School students to collaborate with teachers on designing the curriculum for next year, or asking Upper School students to plot a year long study of their passions? There are so  many possibilities for this model in so many different stages on independence and interdependence.

Scaffolding would be necessary. Adult participation mandatory. Perhaps motivation would be intrinsic.

Learning Artifacts: Blogs

Standard

Below is an email that was sent from a colleague of mine to the parents of his students. I think it is a great example of how digital tools provide a summative artifact of the group’s learning. How cool is it that parents can take a peek into the semester’s worth of learning?

Hi,

The year is rapidly drawing to a close, so I want to reissue and invitation I offered to each of you at parent night last fall.  The invitation is to visit our class blogs at the links below (ask your student which period they are in this semester).

Why visit?  Well, first and foremost, you can look at work done by your child.  Just scroll down the right side to the “categories” section and find your child’s first name and click on it.  Note some students switched sections at mid-year.  You’ll find blogs that are recaps of lessons and some that are questions for their peers or me.  Second, you can look into our classroom and what they’ve been studying in AP Environmental Science.
Why blog?  Well, there are a number of reasons I might ask a student to blog:

1.  To remember or recount what happened in class that day.  We call this a “scribe post.”  This is most helpful to students who miss a lesson.

2.  To offer a question about a confusing concept prior to the test.  We call this a “reflection post.”  Other students are encouraged to answer these questions.
3.  To share something cool or a current event.  We call these “on my mind posts.”
and other reasons to use a blog include:
4.  To debate.  Blogs allow a space for responses after each post, and sometimes I require students to participate in a discussion of a topic like bottled water use in your family).
5.  To create a “positive digital footprint.”  I think I have a responsibility to help these kids leave a more substantial mark on the world wide web besides what they post on Facebook or Twitter!We’ve categorized all the post by the first 3 categories above if you want to see examples at the blog. Each student was required to serve as the class “scribe” at least once a semester and create a summary lesson for those who might have been absent.  Each student had the option of posting reflections before each test for some minor extra credit on the test.  Some students felt compelled to share something neat-a headline, a picture, or even a YouTube video clip.  By doing all this, the kids have had to reflect on what they’ve learned and they’ve created a wonderful online textbook as a resource for AP exam preparation.  Some students used the resource more than others, and that is fine.  Some students switched sections at mid-year, so you may not see many posts from them either.

Besides looking at what your own child created, I want to encourage you to scroll down to the “tag cloud” of topics we’ve studied this year.  Pick a topic that is of interest to you (energy, water, agriculture, etc…) and click on the tag.  We’ve cross-linked all the posts dealing with that topic even though they might be in different units.  That’s the beauty of this course (and use a blog), the interconnections between topics.  As John Muir once said, “When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe.”  Also, notice the “ClustrMap” of the world and look at the global audience these kids have attracted this year!

I’ve truly enjoyed teaching this group this year.

Fuzzy definition of the ED problem

Standard

As I sit through another session at #ettipad, i cannot stop drifting from one idea to the next. @gregkulowiec’s talk about the proper mindset for integrating iPads into the classroom referenced Seymour Papert which made me think about stagecoaches with jet engines which led to Morozov’s bookTo Save Everything Click Here about the downside of technology solutionism which made me think about Sir Ken Robinson’s call to foster, support, and teach creativity which got me thinking about the energy of educator’s like @ijukes and @angelamaiers which in turn made me contemplate the conversations I have with TWITS like @dwillard @fredbartels @pgow @raventech and so many others that influence my thinking which brought me back to Evengy Morozov’s book (which I have not finished) because it seems like of all this distills back to one thing – we have to properly define the problem. iPads, smartphones, laptops, or whatever other tool is developed in the next few years are insignificant if we cannot better understand our problem. I cannot find anyone who is interested in arguing that there aren’t significant problems with education and yet we don’t seem to have a clear definition of the problem we are all trying to solve. Perhaps the wandering thoughts above all just pieces of the definition of the problem.

feeling a bit mad… must be March

Standard

**please excuse this little bit of March mayhem slipping into my usually professional blog

Every year since about 3rd grade I have filled out my March Madness brackets. I had a few good years in my late teens and in college, but lately my picks have been lousy. So it is time to try something new. Below are the rules that rule my picks. It might not work but it should be at least fun.

1. Mascot battle rule: If the mascots were to fight would there be a clear winner?

  • Humans with weapons always win unless facing force of nature or mystical beings.
  • Bears beat dogs and humans without weapons. Dogs always beat cats. Cats beat birds and farm animals. Largest bird wins. Insects of any kind always lose.
  • If your mascot is a tree, nut, fruit or body part…well, sucks to be you. Sorry Syracuse, Ohio State and UNC.

2. Spectrum rule: My favorite colors dictate winner in contest where mascot rule is unclear.

  • warm colors beat cool colors in this order – red, yellow, orange
  • cool colors win in this order – purple, blue, green
  • brown is crap and therefore loses unless facing a pink team… is there one?

Check back for updates about this method over the next two weeks.

Factors of Great Schools Applied to a 1-to-Global Program (NAIS AC Notes Part 2)

Standard

As I reviewed my notes from Jim Collins keynote at the 2013 NAIS Annual Conference and thought about Pat Bassett’s 25 Factors that Great Schools Have in Common, I started thinking about which of these 25 factors were the most closely connected to the success of a 1-to-1 or 1-to-World (Alan November) or 1-to-Global (Providence Day School’s adaptation) program. Below are the factors that I found to impact my planning and implementation of our 1-to-Global program. Below each one is why I selected them. Please note that the numbers match the order from Pat Bassett’s original list.

1. Create and perpetuate an intentional culture shaped by the adults, rooted in universal values of honesty and caring, and relentlessly oriented toward achievement.

The focus must never shift away from the original intent which has to be the creation of the best possible learning environment. The criteria used to define “best possible” may be different from school to school, but the you must be vigilant to ensure that all of the logistics and organization that goes with implementing 1-to-Global does not shift your intention from best possible learning space to easiest to manage 1-to-Global program. This sounds so obvious and is in many ways. However, the day to day realities often distract us from our intention. 

2. Eclectically capitalize on the best ideas about what works in schools, those gleaned from the past as well as those deemed best for the future.

How do we capture and share the best ideas that are generated by teachers using new tools to build new learning models? It is imperative to select and share models that reflect the intention of our programs. This is the work of school leaders who will need to carefully cultivate the space for risk-taking, challenge tackling, and lesson learning from failure. 

3. Manifest a coherent philosophy of learning for students, be it constructivist, Reggio Emilia, Waldorf, Montessori, strengths-based, progressive, traditional, 1:1, or whatever — so long as it remains open to ongoing discussion, testing, and constant refinement.

Can our faculty, staff, and school leaders consistently share why we are moving to 1-to-Global? Have we shared the intention of our program in a way that resonates with our community? Has our community been engaged in shaping and helping to select our philosophy? 

4. Make a substantial commitment to professional development for faculty, expecting teachers to grow as learners themselves and to develop mastery in the art and science of teaching.

The introduction of a 1-to-Global program is a wonderful opportunity to create a chance for faculty to reflect on their instructional practices and goals. Professional development does not need to be sending crowds of faculty to summer iPad boot camps -although you need some faculty to go out into the world and bring back new ideas. IT can simply be bring together cross divisional, cross departmental groups to discuss learning. Insert brain research, personal learning networks, and exposure to thought leaders like Gardner, November, Wormeli, etc. into these conversations and let them work to discuss learning objectives of the students. As the conversation slows, ask your faculty to consider how the tools of your 1-to-Global program will help you achieve your new ideas/goals. 

6. Adopt a big vision, one that continually refreshes itself in order to sustain the enterprise along the five most strategic continua: demographic, environmental, global, financial, and programmatic.

The 1-to-Global program must be connected to your big vision. It is my opinion that simply being 1-to-1 or 1-to-Global is woefully insufficient. The program must be tied to something significant and meaningful. The big vision is the guiding principle of our intentionality. 

13. Redefine the ideal classroom setting as one of intimate environment, not small classes, since the former can occur in schools or classes of any size and even online, and the latter can miss the point of intimacy.

How can technology which is often associated with cold, inpersonal communication be used to create intimacy? Only with intention and deliberate curricular choices that spiral throughout all classrooms. Role playing and discussing hypothetical situations may help your community find ideas and solutions. 

14. Create a financially sustainable future by means other than persistently large annual tuition increases, recognizing that being the best value, rather than the highest price in town, offers the strongest value proposition.

I cannot envision a school that would embark upon a 1-to-Global program without sufficient financial planning to sustain the program, but how do we create fiscal solutions that sustain but also allow for flexibility? 

19. Track student outcomes over time, beyond the years in one’s own school, seeking data on how well the school prepared its students for the next legs of their life journeys — be it the next levels of education or life beyond.

How do we measure the outcomes of adding tools into our learning spaces? Often it wil not be grades or test scores that share the significance of the inclusion of these learning instruments. Look for the stories, models, and examples that demonstrate student centered, active, and engaged learning (insert your own intentions and objectives here). 

20. Seek data to make data-rich (not opinion-rich) decisions, embracing former Education Secretary Margaret Spellings’s observation, “In God we trust; all others, bring data.”

Where do we find compelling and significant data? Look to examples like Chris Bigenho’s SALT survey to find ways to generate the data needed, but also understand that Chris’s example shows that we may need to create new tools to our new purpose. 

21. To avoid unnecessary distractions, educate the board and parents thoroughly about how schools work, and about what student and parent needs a school can and cannot meet.

Routine conversations with the Board and parents about the changes in education and parenting in a digital age are necessary to support the instructional objectives of your program. Neglecting this conversation will impede your progress. 

22. Market their schools with “sticky messages” that tell a compelling story.

Do you have the means and practices in place that enable you to share your successes? If not, how do you help build a consistent and coherent story that shares your successes?

23. Know their priorities when making difficult decisions, ranking first “what’s best for the school,” then “what’s best for the student,” then “what’s best for all other interests.”

Knowing your priorities is key to helping school leaders like grade level heads, department chairs, dean of students, admissions, etc. see the big picture and stay focused on why the success of your 1-to-Global program is the same as the success of your school. 

Please understand that the purpose of this post is entice others into sharing their thoughts, ideas, and successes with their planning and implementing 1-to-1 or 1-to-Global programs.

One to Global or One to World

Standard

Alan November recently published an opinion piece in eSchool News entitled Beyond 1-to-1 Computing: Time for a New Approach calling for schools and educational institutions to step away from the phrase 1-to-1 and move to 1-to-world. I applaud Mr. November for focusing our attention beyond acquisition of hardware. His call to improve professional development so that it moves us from how the tool works to how we use the tool to improve the learning space is spot on and something many of us are already moving toward. The more important insight is lack of leadership development for school thought leaders in 1-to-world environments. Many Director of Technology are experts with hardware, software, and networking, but do they have the skills to help faculty have conversations about higher order thinking skills, lesson plan development, or Puentadora’s SAMR model? Even if they are comfortable with these conversations, do they have the administrative support that will allow teachers to be comfortably uncomfortable enough to take on new challenges ?(intentional avoid using the word “risks” as it makes it sound as though one mistake ruins the learning environment) November suggests that educational leaders need to be given the training to:

  • Craft a clear vision of connecting all students to the world’s learning resources.
  • Model the actions and behaviors they wish to see in their schools.
  • Support the design of an ongoing and embedded staff development program that focuses on pedagogy as much as technology.
  • Move in the role of systems analyst to ensure that digital literacy is aligned with standards.
  • Ensure that technology is seen not as another initiative, but as integral to curriculum.

While I sometimes see Independent Schools look to their leadership to make things happen, it seems to me that we need to help our leaders become leaders who can enable their teachers and staff to make it happen. Clear vision, modeling behavior, and supporting those willing to take on the challenges of creating the best possible learning spaces seem like a great way to get started. Ultimately, it is how we use the tool and how willing we are to adapt that will create the difference, not the tools themselves.

So I am curious… have you and your school done anything the address leadership development? If so, please share. I would love to learn more about what folks are doing. Thanks

Notes from NAIS AC 2013 – Part One

Standard

Thank you to Providence Day School for sending me to the NAIS Annual Conference in Philadelphia, PA. I got to mingle with some of the most extraordinary minds and visionaries. Below is Part One of sharing my experience. Please let me know if you have questions or want to engage with any of the topics below.

REVTalks by Don Buckley, The School at Columbia, Jamie Baker, Martin Institute, Grant Lichtman, the Learning Pond, and Jason Ramsden, Ravenscroft.

IMG_0040 Big Take aways:

  • From @donbuckley – Layering technology on top of a ill defined problem will rarely lead to a solution. The key to problem solving is clearly understanding the problem from all angles.
  • From @raventech Understand your impact on those around you. Consider whether you are a visionary, operator, and processor. What are the types of folks you are working with?

Notes from Jim Collins

IMG_0044 Things that struck me:

  • Consider what are the things that you have made happen and what are the things you have prevented from happening. Ask your colleagues. Are you making things happen? If we are preventing more than we are making things happen, are we in the right space?
  • Reconcile the connection between innovation and discipline.
  • Stay focused on consistent progress. Do wait for the right conditions to try make change happen. Need to forge ahead even when the weather is bad.
  • What is my statements to questions ratio?

Independent Matters -Sekou Andrews, Soumitra Dutta, Alexis Madrigal, & Danah Boyd

IMG_0046

Things to chew on:

  • Are innovators the few or the many? Starting to think that innovators are the many could lead to crowd sourcing solutions.
  • Need to read To Save Everything, Click Here; The Folly of Technological Solutionism by Evegny Morozov
  • Connected Learning – Mimi Ito too much here to paraphrase- Dig in hungry.
  • Be wary of the purpose of dominant design – efficiency and mass production are not necessarily helpful to learning spaces.
  • tension between being in a public and being public – student privacy online
  • the thumb is the new ring finger